đĄď¸ RollingBoil Daily - November 04, 2025
While you were sleeping, the cruelty became the pointâagain. Donald Trump announced he's holding SNAP benefits hostage until the government shutdown ends, weaponizing food assistance for millions of Americans as a bargaining chip in his latest power play. Let that sink in: families who depend on these benefits to eat are now pawns in a political standoff engineered by the very administration that campaigned on "economic prosperity." This isn't governance. It's extortion with a body count, and it's happening while Republican senators block every attempt to end the shutdown they helped create.
Today's newsletter cuts through the chaos to connect the dots you need to see. We're tracking how Trump's SNAP gambit fits into a broader Republican strategy of manufactured crisis, why the DOJ's election interference cases against him never reached a jury (spoiler: it's infuriating), and how even some GOP figures are scrambling to distance themselves from Tucker Carlson's latest descent into open white nationalism. These aren't isolated incidentsâthey're features of a coordinated assault on democratic norms and the social safety net. The question isn't whether they'll push further. It's whether we're paying close enough attention to stop them.
⥠Quick Hits
-
Trump suggests U.S. won't pay any SNAP benefits during shutdown, contradicting court filing
Trump's suggestion to halt SNAP benefits during a government shutdown represents a significant policy position that contradicts established precedent from prior administrations and reflects a hardline approach to federal spending. This statement is relevant to tracking Trump administration policy priorities and positions on social welfare programs, which are central to right-wing policy debates regarding government spending and entitlements. -
Trump presses energy, gas prices as Virginia and New Jersey voters hit the polls
Trump is actively campaigning for Republican candidates in Virginia and New Jersey by emphasizing energy costs and gas prices as key economic issues. The article demonstrates Trump's continued influence over Republican messaging and his focus on economic populism as a central campaign strategy for the 2024 election cycle. -
Thune: Votes âarenât thereâ to eliminate filibuster, despite Trump push
Senate Majority Leader John Thune publicly contradicts President Trump's push to eliminate the filibuster during a government shutdown, signaling internal Republican disagreement on legislative tactics. This reflects tension between Trump's executive preferences and Senate Republican leadership on procedural matters that could affect the party's 2026 midterm prospects. -
Bessent says U.S. has 'lots' of options to use on tariffs if it loses Supreme Court case
Treasury Secretary Bessent signals the Trump administration has contingency plans if the Supreme Court rules against Trump's tariff authority, indicating preparation for potential legal challenges to executive trade powers. This reflects ongoing Republican efforts to expand executive authority on trade policy and demonstrates the administration's commitment to tariff-based economic strategy despite judicial scrutiny. -
Republicans Hold Firm on Filibuster and Prosecutor Veto Power, Despite Trumpâs Frustrations
The article documents tension between Trump and Senate Republicans over judicial confirmations and filibuster rules, highlighting divisions within the GOP on executive power and Senate procedures. Trump's frustration with Republican resistance to breaking the filibuster and confirming prosecutors in Democratic-leaning states reflects broader debates within the right-wing coalition about institutional reform and executive authority. -
The GOP Civil War Over Nick Fuentes Has Just Begun
This article documents internal Republican Party tensions regarding Tucker Carlson's platform being used to promote white nationalist Nick Fuentes, highlighting divisions within GOP leadership over association with alt-right figures. The controversy represents a significant moment in tracking how mainstream conservative media and Republican establishment figures navigate relationships with far-right movements and personalities. -
The Tariffs Case Is About Power and Loyalty on the Right
The article examines a Supreme Court case challenging Trump's unilateral tariff authority, framing it as a test of presidential power and loyalty within right-wing politics. The case highlights tensions between executive authority and legal constraints, central to Trump administration governance and Republican party dynamics regarding executive overreach. -
President Trump facing a number of domestic challenges this week
The article covers multiple pressing domestic challenges facing the Trump administration, including state elections, Supreme Court tariff proceedings, and an ongoing government shutdown. These issues directly impact Trump's policy agenda and political standing heading into a critical week. The convergence of electoral, judicial, and fiscal challenges represents significant pressure points for the administration's governance.
đ By The Numbers
- 14th time - Senate failed to reopen government, tying longest shutdown record
- 134,000 - Federal workers in Virginia affected by government shutdown
- $2 per gallon - Trump's target gasoline price in campaign pitch to voters
đ° Today's Big Stories
1. Trump says he's withholding SNAP benefits until shutdown ends
Trump Holds Food Assistance Hostage in Shutdown Standoff
President Trump escalated the ongoing government shutdown crisis Tuesday by announcing he will withhold SNAP benefitsâthe federal food assistance program serving roughly 42 million Americansâuntil Democrats agree to reopen the government. In a Truth Social post, Trump blamed "Radical Left Democrats" for the impasse while claiming the program expanded dramatically under Biden, signaling he views cutting off food aid to low-income families as acceptable leverage in the budget battle.
The move represents a dramatic weaponization of essential safety net programs, with Trump effectively holding millions of vulnerable Americans hostage to extract political concessions. SNAP benefits, formerly known as food stamps, serve children, elderly individuals, people with disabilities, and working families who struggle to afford groceries. Many states are already grappling with funding lapses from the shutdown, and a prolonged cutoff of SNAP would push families toward impossible choices between food, rent, and medical care. Trump's framingâthat benefits increased excessively under Bidenâignores that temporary pandemic-era expansions have largely ended, and that increased enrollment reflected genuine economic hardship.
The human cost could be staggering. Food banks nationwide are already stretched thin and cannot absorb the sudden loss of SNAP benefits for tens of millions of people. Children who rely on these benefits for adequate nutrition face immediate harm, while working families living paycheck-to-paycheck would be pushed into crisis. This isn't abstract policyâit's groceries disappearing from kitchen tables while politicians play chicken in Washington.
Watch for how long Republicans will tolerate using food assistance as a bargaining chip, and whether moderate GOP members break ranks as constituents feel the impact. State officials are already sounding alarms about their inability to maintain benefits without federal funding, and advocacy groups are exploring legal challenges. The question now is whether the political backlash from starving families will force a resolution before the damage becomes irreversible.
2. Why the DOJ's cases against Trump for election interference never came to a jury
Justice Delayed: How the FBI's Political Caution Derailed Trump Prosecution
What Happened
According to investigative journalists Carol Leonnig and Aaron Davis in their new book Injustice, the Department of Justice's criminal cases against Donald Trump for election interference never reached a juryânot due to lack of evidence, but because of institutional paralysis. Following the January 6th insurrection, the FBI's overriding concern about appearing politically independent effectively stymied aggressive prosecution of the former president's attempts to overturn the 2020 election. This bureaucratic hesitation created crucial delays that allowed Trump to run out the clock on accountability.
The Political Context
The revelations expose a bitter irony: the very institution tasked with upholding the rule of law allowed concerns about appearing political to prevent holding a former president accountable for allegedly being political in the most dangerous way possible. While Attorney General Merrick Garland faced mounting pressure from Democrats and legal experts to move swiftly, the FBI's institutional cautionâshaped by years of right-wing attacks on its credibilityâcreated a self-fulfilling prophecy. Trump and his allies successfully weaponized the "political persecution" narrative to paralyze the justice system, even as evidence of his election interference mounted.
Why This Matters
This failure represents a devastating blow to democratic accountability and sets a dangerous precedent: a president can attempt to overturn an election and face no criminal consequences if they can delay proceedings long enough. The FBI's prioritization of its reputation over its mission allowed Trump to return to the campaign trail and potentially the White House without ever answering to a jury. For those concerned about democratic backsliding, this case study reveals how institutional norms and fear of Republican backlash can be exploited to place powerful figures above the law.
What to Watch
Monitor whether the DOJ implements any reforms to prevent similar delays in future cases involving high-level officials. With Trump back on the ballot, watch how this prosecutorial failure emboldens both his campaign rhetoric and his promises of retribution against political enemies. The broader question looms: if the justice system cannot hold a former president accountable for election interference, what constraints remain on executive power?
3. Why the DOJ's cases against Trump for election interference never came to a jury
The Cases That Never Were: How Trump Escaped Accountability for Election Interference
What Happened
According to investigative journalists Carol Leonnig and Aaron Davis in their new book Injustice, the Department of Justice's criminal cases against Donald Trump for election interference never reached a juryânot due to lack of evidence, but because of institutional paralysis. Despite the unprecedented January 6th attack on the Capitol and mounting evidence of Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election, the FBI's overwhelming concern about appearing "political" effectively stymied investigations during the critical period when action was most needed.
The Political Context
This revelation exposes a bitter irony: the very institution tasked with upholding the rule of law allowed a former president to evade accountability because it feared political backlash. While Trump and his allies faced no such hesitation in weaponizing claims of a "witch hunt," the FBI's leadership prioritized the appearance of independence over actual justice. This institutional timidity came even as Trump openly plotted his return to power and promised retribution against his perceived enemies. The delay meant that by the time Special Counsel Jack Smith brought charges, Trump's legal strategy of running out the clock proved devastatingly effective.
Why This Matters
The consequences of this failure extend far beyond one man's legal troubles. The precedent is now set: a president can attempt to overthrow an election and face no criminal consequences if they can delay proceedings long enough. Trump's return to the White House has effectively ended these prosecutions, demonstrating that political powerânot evidence or lawâdetermines accountability at the highest levels. This represents a fundamental breakdown in democratic guardrails and emboldens future authoritarian behavior.
What to Watch
Monitor how the Trump administration retaliates against those who did pursue accountability, including Special Counsel Smith and DOJ officials who supported the investigations. The real test of our institutions isn't just whether they can investigate wrongdoingâit's whether they can act decisively before it's too late. That test has already been failed once.
4. Republican figures distance themselves after Carlson interviews Nick Fuentes
The Mainstreaming of White Nationalism: Tucker Carlson Platforms Nick Fuentes as GOP Scrambles to Respond
Tucker Carlson's decision to interview avowed white nationalist Nick Fuentes has sparked a rare public fracture within conservative media, exposing the ongoing struggle over how far right the Republican coalition will drift. Fuentes, known for Holocaust denial, antisemitic rhetoric, and organizing white supremacist rallies, received a platform on Carlson's show last weekâbut according to prominent conservative pundit Ben Shapiro, Carlson didn't challenge these views. Instead, Shapiro accused Carlson of deliberately "smoothing over" and "watering down" Fuentes's extremist positions to make them palatable to mainstream audiences. The criticism cuts to the heart of a troubling pattern: not whether extremists should be debated, but whether they're being legitimized.
The political fallout reveals both the influence Carlson wields and the Republican Party's continued inability to draw clear lines against white nationalism. While figures like Senator Ted Cruz issued statements rejecting antisemitism and expressing support for Israel, most stopped conspicuously short of condemning Carlson himself for providing Fuentes a megaphone. This careful danceâdenouncing the message while protecting the messengerâillustrates how thoroughly Carlson has entrenched himself within the GOP ecosystem, even after leaving Fox News. Meanwhile, Fuentes represents a growing faction of young, extremely online white nationalists who have found increasing acceptance in MAGA circles, having previously dined with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago alongside Kanye West in 2022.
Why this matters: This isn't just about one interview. It's about the systematic normalization of white nationalist talking points within conservative media and their creep into Republican politics. When one of the right's most-watched personalities platforms a Holocaust denier without meaningful pushback, and when GOP leaders respond with carefully parsed statements that avoid accountability, it signals how far the Overton window has shifted. MSNBC analysts argue that Fuentes has effectively sparked a "MAGA civil war," but the more alarming reality may be how many conservatives are unwilling or unable to push back decisively against his influence.
Watch for: Whether any major Republican figures will directly condemn Carlson, not just Fuentes; how this affects Carlson's standing with GOP officials ahead of 2026 and 2028 campaigns; and whether other conservative media personalities follow Shapiro's lead in calling out the platforming of extremistsâor whether this moment of pushback fades as it has so many times before.
5. Live updates: Senate fails to end shutdown as Trump bucks SNAP order; Key elections underway
Senate Stalemate Extends Historic Shutdown as Millions Face Uncertainty
The Crisis Deepens: The Senate failed yet again on Tuesday to end the federal government shutdown, now tied as the longest in U.S. history at 35 days and counting. This marks the 14th failed attempt to reopen the government, with no clear resolution in sight despite Senate Majority Leader John Thune's cautiously optimistic Monday statement that operations could resume by week's end. The continued impasse comes as President Trump reportedly pushed back against orders related to SNAP (food stamp) benefits, adding another layer of chaos to an already dire situation for federal workers and vulnerable Americans.
Political Dysfunction on Full Display: While Republicans control the Senate under Thune's leadership, the Democratic caucus appears fractured on strategy, complicating efforts to present a united front against the shutdown. This internal division weakens the opposition's negotiating position and allows the GOP to deflect blame even as their party controls both the White House and Senate. The political maneuvering comes as 800,000 federal workers have now missed multiple paychecks, and critical government services remain suspended or severely limited.
Real-World Consequences Mount: The human toll of this manufactured crisis cannot be overstated. Federal employees are visiting food banks, SNAP recipients face potential benefit disruptions, airport security lines are growing as TSA workers call in sick, and essential services from food safety inspections to tax refund processing remain in jeopardy. This shutdown exemplifies how right-wing political brinkmanship directly harms working families while lawmakers continue collecting their paychecks.
What's Next: Watch for whether Thune's optimism materializes into actual votes by week's end, and monitor any further Trump interference with safety net programs. Key elections mentioned in the headline may also shift political calculations. Most critically, track whether Democrats can unify their message and strategyâthe longer this drags on, the more leverage Republicans gain to extract concessions that could undermine essential government functions long-term.
RollingBoil ⢠Tracking right-wing actions and accountability
Stay informed. Stay vigilant.